Newspaper Ads from the 7 Rivers Region Classifieds from the 7 Rivers Region Jobs in the 7 Rivers Region Cars in the 7 Rivers Region Homes for Sale in the 7 Rivers Region Rental PRoperties in the 7 Rivers Region & Rivers Region Website Directory Shopping in the 7 Rivers Region
 SPONSOR LINKS
spacer

PRINT ADS

spacer
 Home > Opinion > Story

Published - Friday, July 30, 2004

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (1 comment(s))

Paper receipts won't cure electronic voting ills

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
.
Moveon.org recently organizing rallies in 19 states, including Wisconsin, to protest electronic voting. As part of its "computer ate my vote" campaign, moveon.org is promoting state and federal legislation that would require electronic ballot boxes to issue a paper receipt. The federal legislation has the backing of Wisconsin Reps. Ron Kind (D-La Crosse) and Tom Petri (R-Fond du Lac).

Skeptics are right to worry about computer voting. The systems are prone to software bugs, frauds and hackers. However, moveon.org is pursuing the wrong solution because paper receipts could create a false sense of security that computer voting is honest and accurate. The problem isn't the lack of a paper trail; it's lack of transparency.

Manufacturers of computer voting machines claim their counting software as proprietary information, which means that the public can't verify how the software is programmed and monitored. Imagine for example, if a town hired a private vendor to count paper ballots in a locked room and then destroyed the ballots before the public could examine them. That's exactly what computer voting does, and it will happen this fall on a massive scale. Between eight to 10 percent of all ballots nationwide will be conducted by computer vote, and the percentage is much higher in battleground states like Ohio and Florida.

The paper receipt doesn't help. A hacker determined to alter an election outcome can easily devise a system in which the receipts and vote totals don't match. Unless there are two copies - one for the voter and one for the city or county clerk - there is no way to compare paper receipts against the announced outcome. It's a stretch to believe that enough voters will keep their receipts to produce a legitimate recount.

There's only one genuine solution to computer voting: allow experts representing both political parties to examine the software and verify its accuracy. It's one thing to privatize concessions at a national park; it's quite another to privatize the counting of ballots. It's outrageous that America is preparing for an election in which millions of votes will be counted in secret.
.
   Advertisement   
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

justin_o_guy wrote on Jul 29, 2007 9:01 AM:

" Until Americans are willing to go to different locations around the city & county & actually stand for a head count I dont see us stopping the vote being manipulated. As soon as we see the election being stolen we need to organize & count ourselves. It's an easy enough process, tho time consuming. I would propose we all go to different public places & be counted. One side of the road for Dems, the other for Republicans & another area for any thirp party. All we need is some signs & "Barrier Tape" & T-posts. All it would take to expose attempted vote fraud is for a few places to do this & it make obvious the disparity in reported votes versus the real votes. That would surely cause an uproar. The American people are like Howard Hughes. We allowed our servants power over us until now we have been taken hostage by those who we empowered to watch after our best interests. Its time we fire a few of them & retake our place in society. I will be damned if I will refer to any elected representative as anything with any higher degree of respect than Sir or Ma'am. I do not see them as any more respectable than those who pay their wages. I have never seen an employee referred to by the employer as The Honorable Mr. or Mrs. when he addressed his employee. "


The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Holmen Courier.

 Post a comment »

(optional)
   
Thank you for your comments! Once your comments are approved, they will appear on the site.
About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
Copyright © 2006 The Holmen Courier. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.
 
 

NEWSPAPER ADS